Among the Reels

Tags

Microfilm 1651, Microfilm 1905, Microfilm 689

This blog is all about showcasing Penn’s collections, these of course include a variety of media and different types of items so I thought I would feature something a bit different this week. Instead of a single item, I want to write about a class of items which, taken as a whole, are certainly “unique” – Penn’s collection of microfilmed manuscripts and archives.

Friendly Microfilm Drawer at Van Pelt

The lowly microfilm has taken a lot of abuse over the years for its sometimes grainy quality, retina-numbing display, and propensity to spool all over the floor when one least expects. However, digging deeply into Penn’s microfilm holdings it’s not hard to see why microtexts have been essential to scholars for decades. Penn’s extended microfilm collections of government documents, obscure magazines, and early printed books all remain valuable even as more and more of them become digitized [1]. Yet for me, it’s the collections of archival material that offer the most continued benefit from the medium.Take the example below from Penn’s microfilm collection – a promissory note for the delivery of beaver pelts in Quebec from 1713. This forms part of a six-reel collection of microfilmed documents relating to French Canada taken from regional archives in France. Instead of making the trip to La Rochelle scholars at Penn have access right now to a wealth of archival material.

Frame from Van Pelt Microfilm 1651, reel 1. Documents filmed in La Rochelle by the Centre de recherche en histoire économique du Canada français.

Further, as with digital resources, researchers can quickly shift from archive to archive as they change reels. From a source closer to home, below is an image of a 1666 posthumous inventory of the goods of a woman named Charity White, found in the court papers of Suffolk county Massachusetts which are reproduced on 72 rolls of microfilm held at Penn [2].

Frame from Van Pelt Microfilm 689, reel 1. Records of the Probate Court of Suffolk County, Mass., 1629-1799.

Among the goods present in the inventory are a “chamber pot,” “a dish or platter,” “a hud and a cloak,””a feather bed,” and various other household items. Containing a record of the material possessions of thousands of people who lived in the Boston area as well as documents relating to bastardy and contested wills these are important sources for scholars of early America and you won’t find them at just any library.

Skipping ahead from the early modern to the modern, Penn holds a wealth of 20th century special collections on microfilm. Doing research on the Cold War and Hollywood? Penn has 14 juicy reels of confidential surveillance files from the entertainment industry. Writing about presidential campaigns and local politics? Try the 51 reels of papers from the archives of the Republican Party. Beyond these large collections look also to the smaller collections which are practically unique to Penn.

Frames from Van Pelt Microfilm 1905

The document above, for example, was specially filmed in the 1940s from papers of a Lithuanian exile organization entitled “34 secret documents issued by the People’s Commissariats for Internal Affairs and State Security pertaining to mass arrests, exile, and deportation to corrective labor camps from Lithuania in 1941.” These kinds of documents, held by private organizations and individuals are especially difficult to get a hold of and I suspect that Penn is one of the few places where researchers could find the memos above [3].

Mt. Athos, Iveron Ms. 5437. Description in Lambros, Catalogue of the Greek manuscripts on Mount Athos (Cambridge, 1900) v. 2, p. 263.

Moving again backwards in time, researchers at Penn have access to a treasure trove of medieval manuscripts – many specially microfilmed for Penn faculty. For example, interested in this early-14th century Greek compendium of grammatical and other works?

You have two choices: travel to the  Iveron Monastery on Mt. Athos in Greece (sorry no women allowed) or come to Penn and use Van Pelt Microforms Medieval MSS 534 [4]. Want to peruse documents from the Vatican secret Archives? No need to travel to Rome – there are thousands of documents from the archives in the Henry Charles Lea microfilm collection right here at Penn.

Though each microfilm reel at Penn necessarily duplicates a text or item extant elsewhere, taken as a whole, the collection of rare and hard-to-find archival material is truly unique.

——–

[1]

See the excellent guide to large microfilm sets at: <http://gethelp.library.upenn.edu/guides/microforms/microforms.html>. Penn is also a member of the Center for Research Libraries (CRL) which has a lending library of tens of thousands of reels of scarcely held microfilm and well worth checking out.

[2]

These reels cover the years 1629-1799 and are cataloged as Microfilm 689. Only three other libraries hold the complete set.

[3]

These documents were filmed from their owners in New York in the 1940s and it seems that only Penn and the NYPL have copies today.

[4]

For a detailed guide to the majority of the medieval manuscripts on film here at Penn see  <http://www.library.upenn.edu/collections/microforms/medmss.html>.

A Rocket Cat? Early Modern Explosives Treatises at Penn

Tags

LJS 442, Smith Folio TP272 .A7 1625, UPenn Ms. Codex 109

I was puzzled when a friend asked me a few weeks ago if I’d seen the “rocket cat” illustrated in a Penn manuscript which had been featured on the book blog BibliOdyssey in November. The image, from what was described as a 1584 “Feuer Buech” manuscript, appeared to show a cat and a bird propelled by rockets towards a castle.

UPenn Ms. Codex 109, f137r.

I enthusiastically retweeted the image and began trying to figure out just what was going on in the manuscript [1]. Since then, the “rocket cat” has gone somewhat viral, appearing in the Atlantic, BoingBoing, and elsewhere. Given the illustration’s new-found fame I thought it would be worthwhile to provide a bit of context.

The illustration above comes from UPenn Ms. Codex 109 which came to the library as part of the Edgar Fahs Smith history of chemistry collection. This manuscript is one of several at Penn dealing with the early history of gunpowder, artillery, and explosives. Based on the title I assumed it was one of the many manuscript copies of the famous c.1420 Feuerwerkbuch which provides instructions to artillery masters on how to construct weapons, aim guns, and manufacture various explosives [2]. So where does the explosive cat fit in? I looked through both the printed German text of the Feuerwerkbuch and the English translation in vain – “explosive fire balls” and “fire arrows” are covered in the text but no fire cats. Along the way I also discovered that another of Penn’s manuscripts had an almost identical illustration:

LJS 442:Book of instruction for a cannon master, f.60r

In this case, a c.1590 “Book of instruction for a cannon master.” Clearly these fiery animals were more than just the fancy of one manuscript illustrator. Further, the text accompanying the illustration in both Codex 109 and LJS 442 did not match anything I could trace in editions of the Feuerwerkbuch. Fortunately, in the torrent of tweets about the rocket cat, one came in citing yet another example of the illustration, this time from a manuscript at the Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg.

Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg, Cod. Pal. germ. 128, f.74r

Heidelberg has cataloged their manuscript as the “Buch von den probierten Künsten” of Franz Helm. Though drawing on the Feuerwerkbuch, this text dates from a century later (c. 1530) and includes large new sections on siege warfare and different types of explosive weapons. In fact, the Penn collection includes an identified copy of Helm’s treatise, though unillustrated (LJS 254). Thanks to a recent critical edition of the work I was able to confirm that the text of both LJS 442 and Codex 109 were indeed from the Buch von den probierten Künsten [3].

Franz Helm of Cologne was an artillery master in the service of various German princes and likely served in campaigns against Turkish forces during the mid-16th century. His  treatise circulated widely in manuscript but was not published until 1625. Remarkably, that print edition of his work (a copy of which is here at Penn) also includes an image of the cat and bird:

Armamentarium principale oder Kriegsmunition und Artillerie-Buch (Frankfurt a.M., 1625), p.48

So what does Helm actually say about these explosive animals? Are there rockets involved at all? In the text accompanying the images is a section entitled “To set fire to a castle or city which you can’t get at otherwise” [4]. This section details how to use doves and cats loaded with flammable devices to set fire to enemy positions. On cats the text paints a grisly picture of attaching lit sacks of incendiaries onto the animals to have them return to their homes and set fire to them. In my awkward translation:

“Create a small sack like a fire-arrow … if you would like to get at a town or     castle, seek to obtain a cat from that place. And bind the sack to the back of the cat, ignite it, let it glow well and thereafter let the cat go, so it runs to the nearest castle or town, and out of fear it thinks to hide itself where it ends up in barn hay or straw it will be ignited.” [5]

There’s no way to know if Helm himself ever employed this method of pyrotechnic warfare but strangely enough the idea of using cats and birds in just this way appears in historical texts from many disparate regions of the world. In a magisterial article on the subject, the Finnish scholar Pentti Aalto cites examples of incendiary-bearing cats and birds from a 3rd c. BCE Sanskrit text, the Russian Primary Chronicle, early Scandinavian sources, and an early modern history of Genghis Khan [6].

Though not actually depicting ‘rockets’ of any kind, these images help demonstrate the enormous demand for manuals on gunnery and explosives in the early modern period as well as the robust world of 16th c. manuscript copying and the persistence of illustrations and manuscript forms into print.

[UPDATE: Alexis Madrigal does a great job summarizing this piece over at the Atlantic! Thanks!]

[UPDATE – March 2014: See additional coverage at Atlas Obscura, the Associated Press and now a wonderful essay from Ben Breen at the Appendix.]

———

[1] For a storified account of these tweets see http://storify.com/MitchFraas/cat-with-jetpack

[2] For a facsimile of the first printed edition of the Feuerwerkbuch (Augsburg, 1529) along with a transcription in modern German see Hassenstein, Das Feuerwerkbuch von 1420, (Munich, 1941). For an English translation of the manuscript text of the Feuerwerkbuch with notes see Gerald W. Kramer and Klaus Leibnitz, “The Firework Book: Gunpowder in Medieval Germany,” The Journal of the Arms & Armour Society 17.1 (March 2001), p. 1-88.

[3] Rainer Lang, Franz Helm und sein “Buch von den probierten Künsten (Wiesbaden, 2001).

[4] In the early modern German text: “Ein Schloß, oder stadt anzünden der du sonst nicht zu kommen magst.”

[5] Many thanks to Brigitte Burris for her help with the text – all errors are mine of course! The Heidelberg manuscript (the most legible) reads: “Mach ein klein secklein wie zu einem fewer pfeyl…tracht ob du mogest Bekhomen im schloss oder statt, ein katzen so darein gehörig, unnd bind das secklein der katzen auff den Rucke, zunde es an lass wol gluen, unnd darnach die katzen Lauffen, So tracht sie dennegsten, dem schloss oder statt zw, und vor forcht gedenckt sie sich zuuerfriechenn, wo sie in scheweren hew oder stroe findt, wurtt es von ir angezundet.”  The printed text from the 1625 edition (p.49) is pictured below:

[6] Pentii Aalto, “Kautilya on Siegecraft,” Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae (Series B) 223 (1983), pp. 11-21. The extract from the Russian Primary Chronicle describing the actions of Olga of Kiev (c.945 CE) is particularly striking:

“Olga requested three pigeons and three sparrows from each household. Upon their receipt, her men attached rags dipped in sulphur to the feet of each bird. When the birds returned to their nests, they lit the city on fire and the Derevlians perished in their homes.Olga’s vengeance was now complete.” The Russian Primary chronicle : Laurentian text, (Mediaeval Academy of America,1953), p.81.